Follow me on Twitter

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Tenants rule, owners are absent

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Columnists/Tarun_Vijay/The_Right_View/Tenants_rule_owners_are_absent/articleshow/3042464.cms

Published on :-15 May 2008,

Dr Do Little issued a strong statement condemning the dastardly act and Mr. Do Nothings shook the media headlines before leaving for their summer vacation. That's how the Jaipur blasts have been dealt with. Like any other blast, like any other calamity inflicted by Osama bin Laden's bravehearts who choose their targets in the thick of night or from among the innocent populace going to temples or markets. This is the level of courage they show in the name of their faith.

The basic malady however remains unattended. Surrounded by failed states and finding it compelling to be soft on terror-shelters in return for votes, a bleeding India tries to see some hope in Gurgaon-Bangalore (IT, call centre) progress barometers which clouds the basic point – is the state willing to take on terrorism full steam.

The half-hearted, fifty-fifty, salt and sweet policy to deal with terror gives us more Afzals and Jaipurs as attacks on Jammu, Akshardham, Varanasi and Parliament continue. A wet paper state is worse than being a soft one which refuses to see issues of infiltration, jihad , Maoism, and growing separatism as part of one big assault against the Indian state and her geographical entity, mind and spirit.

Nations are run by owners, not tenants. The maliks are those who face storms and sacrifice their lives for 'their' motherland without ever dreaming of a return gift. The children of Mother India, the real ones, consider themselves to be infused with the power and sense of belonging to every inch of our holy land, regard the land as a goddess personified, a living entity and not just a conglomeration of rivers, jungles, peoples and buildings. Then the land, India runs in our veins – we live her, adore her, devote ourselves for her service, the chant Vande Mataram is no longer a meaningless word but creates an aura of patriotism around our actions and thoughts. Every bit of her history and culture and people is reflected in the behaviour and actions of Mother India's children. Like an owner. Then the people are not just voters, they are your own kith and kin and any one anywhere who attacks them or hurts them automatically becomes your sworn enemy too. One doesn't have to ask ‘whom do you belong to' either of the security personnel who sacrificed their lives to save Parliament or of some of the unworthy insiders or the Afzals and their co-conspirators. The choice would be obvious.

But that's expected of owners.

Today we have just tenants who use the motherland as a piece of real estate for their personal ends. Tenants consider themselves as beneficiaries. If the rotten system helps them stay longer, they are not bothered to change it. They don't fight the mischievous neighbour trespassing or breaking a boundary wall. At the most a tenant would report it to the owner – look this is happening to your land – take care if you wish to do so. Only owners would have a commitment and strength to safeguard it, change and improve the system and take hard, unpopular decisions. Tenants can have "statement governance" that smiles when slapped and laughs when hit hard for an award or appreciation from New York, or London. Awards for peace and tolerance.

The warriors of 1857 were owners. The revolutionaries and freedom fighters, the Kargil victors and martyrs were too, the inheritors and the children of Mother India.

How can they, who loot national wealth to keep it in foreign banks, shut their eyes to territorial erosion and constitutional corrosion while continuing with election campaigning for the next round of 'money harvesting', call themselves children of Mother India and hence legitimate owners of this land? Anyone, any faith or caste or creed or belief or an atheist can be an inheritor of this blessed ownership if he does something in his life for the good of society without eyeing a free bungalow in Lutyen's Delhi. But not those for whom serving the nation is a rude synonym for serving their own interests.

Scrapping POTA, silence on infiltration, half-hearted responses to continuing terrorism, committees to influence media and the judiciary to free the lecturer involved in the Parliament attack, a colonial attitude on civilisational matters, hate for Sanskrit and anything that relates with the quintessential characteristics of the land called India only indicates an alienated mindset controlling the polity.

Hence M F Husain must be honoured for painting nudes of goddesses but Danish cartoons should be banned and condemned. Reservations for non-Hindus must be announced from rooftops and Hindu icons can be called mythical, unproven, mere stories and fit for demolition while Hindu refuges are condemned to oblivion and de-listed from security conclaves. Can you believe that the largest Hindu organisations in the world like the RSS or their ideological brothers in Vishwa Hindu Parishad have never been officially invited to the President's banquets and Republic Day celebrations at homes and dinners? But those who have a history of working against India's soul and territorial integrity have always been on the list of invitees since Viceregal times. This Siberian-Gulag mindset of the rulers smacks of an alienated sense of perverted history and a vengeful attitude. Not an Indian lineage surely.

Still we say, we are a democracy and we are progressing well.

If wealth and the infrastructure were the only criteria for a nation's growth and happiness index, why did we drive the British out? They were ruling through Indians, creating ICS-es and Raibahadurs and Sergeants and head clerks from our midst. They were benefiting Indians too while depositing their share of loot loyally in British coffers, including our books, ancient manuscripts and the Kohinoor. What was wrong in that if the present loot and Swiss accounts of politicians coupled with tolerance for terrorists is accepted for the sake of secularism?

Patriotic jawans would like to wipe out the scourge of terrorism. They are denied permission. Even if government policies result in frustration and incidents of suicide among the forces come to the fore, the Supreme Court would like the terrorist, who waged war on India, to be hanged till death. But governors, the tenants, would like him to be pardoned. A doctor who saved hundreds of lives was shown the door by a legislation exclusively targeting him introduced by those who considered yielding to a rogue ally more important than saving the honour of a great citizen. When the Supreme Court tears off a bad law, the minister and Prime Minister stare blankly as if nothing has happened.

It shows a disconnect between the soul of the nation and her body. The muscles remain paralysed.

A failure of nerves, making muscles numbed.

In medical terms it is known as myasthenia gravis (MG), an auto-immune disease that affects the transmission of signals from nerves to muscles, described thus: "The symptoms are troubling, yet subtle. You might notice, for example, occasional double vision, drooping eyelids, or the occasional difficulty to chew or swallow food. You may become hoarse or talk through your nose. It may be hard to smile, and people may tell you that you look depressed, even though you feel fine."

The same way the signals from the nerve centre of the state and power to the muscles of the armed forces is missing. See the latest annual report of the Ministry of Home Affairs. It is silent on how many terrorists and their accomplices have been convicted or the number of illegal Bangladeshi infiltrators deported. It shows that terrorism and murders outnumber such incidents in Jammu and Kashmir. Where is the reaction to this?

It is time to throw off the shackles of a colonial mindset and face the cowards squarely.

Weapons of Hate Destruction

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Columnists/Tarun_Vijay/The_Right_View/Weapons_of_Hate_Destruction/articleshow/3021915.cms

Published on :-8 May 2008,

(This is the concluding piece of a two-part series on India's China policy. The first part appeared last week)

A nation is as strong as its people. Bombs and other military hardware help to keep the morale high and give a wining-edge feeling, but ultimately it's the human material that wins or loses. The weak make a huge list of complaints and the powerful act at a cool pace. Machines and nuclear buttons do not operate on their own, but need human instructions and remain captive in the hands of those who man their safety. And the brave would hardly feel the need to re-do a Hiroshima while the compromising variety would never have the courage to enter the nuclear war room. So how should India, shining so brightly on the global scene because of the brilliance and knowledge of her children, look at China, a powerful neighbour whose trustworthiness has always been suspect in Indian minds?

We and China were unshackled some time. They were known the world over as opium eaters and lazy. Today they are the best in sports, world champions in more than 32 disciplines and a globally recognised military and economic superpower. Almost every Indian, African, European and American home has something that's made in China. A strong sense of nationalism and an uncompromising patriotism is reigning over their national resurgence. This, they still chose to call as Communism, post-Mao.

Today they are among the highest consumers of green vegetables and run professional universities and science institutions, have established close ties with Pakistan, encircled India quite deftly and have left Indian intellectuals and defence experts to write books on how powerfully China has become. Who is to be blamed for this situation? Of late the Chinese have started respecting Indians because of our steady economic growth rate touching 8-9 per cent annually and growing military strength. Agni-III's successful launch has reinforced this. Like any other country, China too will listen to us only when we are seen as a strong, nationalist power, which unfortunately has been a low priority since the government on Communist crutches took over at South Block.

There are two sweet looking traps on our China path. Leftists and their blood brothers Islamo-fascists would like Delhi to be blindly anti-America and align with ideological comrades in Beijing. The second is going into the American camp to denounce China on every count and let Indian soil be used for a US game of isolating China in a region that's legitimately ours. Both should be avoided and India must look at China from an Indian perspective. India must look at China on its own terms, not as a hedge against America or as an ideological tool for attacking America. Similarly, India needs to see the Islamic supremacists for what they are – a danger to India and not a friend just because of their hatred for America.

As far as the follies of the Indian leaders in understanding and evaluating Chinese intentions properly, the less said the better.

Since the 1950s, the Jan Sangh cautioned Nehru's government that China is eyeing India territory, it has gobbled up Tibet, Tibet's autonomy is crucial to India's security (read Vajpayee's speeches and Sardar Patel's letter to Nehru), China is making roads on Indian borders, beware of the Communists, etc. All of this fell on deaf ears and we have been left with no choice but to hang certificates from western countries singing paeans to our great entrepreneurship, Laxmi Mittal and Tata's worldwide empire and the growing knowledge surge that we use to hide the ever-increasing number of poor, the farmers and un-attended rural sector. Our entire world view of sports and glory on the field has shrunk to cricket and cheerleaders, that too imported from the Gora Lands to shake their hips. We are surrounded by failed states and hardly any neighbour respects us. An outfit like the Bangladesh Rifles brings our dead soldiers tied upside down on a bamboo pole and we turn our face away.

A government that survives on the support of the Communists can hardly be expected to face an expansionist neighbour which refuses to issue visas to our Arunachali residents.

Indian Communists – China's assets
China's biggest asset threatening India is not its nuclear arsenal or economic superiority, but Indian Communists. Beijing doesn't need to do anything else in India but ensure that Indian Communists remain important players in Indian politics. They have been the biggest supporters of China's presence in India – just a few months ago they demanded that Chinese companies be allowed to invest in Indian ports and bring in hundreds of Chinese workers and engineers which the government refused on security grounds. If this is so in 2008, the other side of the same coin is that the same Communists had sided with China during the 1962 war. While the entire nation stood united against the aggressors, the only exception was the Communist Party of India (CPI,-then unified) which refused to condemn Chinese aggression. Finally Pandit Nehru had to arrest hundreds of CPI leaders and workers under charges of sedition. And see the parallel too.

1962 – Communists arrested, RSS honoured
The same Nehru government invited Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) workers to join the 1963 Republic Day parade in full RSS uniform in honour of their patriotic work during the war. There are two very interesting episodes that describe Communist attitude during the Sixties. Blitz under Karanjia was a darling of the Indian left and it published the following news item in its August 31, 1960 issue: “In upper Garhwal, there are two villages - Chanyee and Thanyee. The Communists have gone round to tell people that the area belongs to China because the names of the villages sound like Chinese” (Quoted by Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee in Lok Sabha, Four Decades in Parliament, Shipra, vol 3, pp 23). They also staged plays showing the Chinese army as 'liberators'.

With Chinese aggression on the Garhwal-Kumaon border on the rise, the then Uttar Pradesh government issued an advertisement to boost the morale of people living in border areas. The CPI mouthpiece Janyug also carried it, perhaps mistakenly or got tempted by the ad revenue, but immediately afterwards apologised for carrying it thus: “We committed a blunder by publishing this advertisement; we have committed a sin, and we should not have called China aggressor and we have hurt the sentiments of our people, we shall never repeat such an act. This time we should be forgiven..." (Quoted from the same book of Vajpayee's parliamentary speeches).

Sardar Patel had an inkling about things to come. In a letter to Nehru on November 7, 1950 he warned not only about China’s real intentions but also said that China's entry into Tibet would help fifth columnists (he put Indian Communists at par with them) and the Indian Communist Party.

The letter is so prophetic and important that I can't resist the temptation to quote it at length. Patel said: “We have to consider what new situation now faces us as a result of the disappearance of Tibet, as we knew it, and the expansion of China almost up to our gates... Recent and bitter history also tells us that Communism is no shield against imperialism and that the Communists are as good or as bad imperialists as any other. Chinese ambitions in this respect not only cover the Himalayan slopes on our side but also include the important part of Assam... Let us also consider the political conditions on this potentially troublesome frontier. Our northern and northeastern approaches consist of Nepal, Bhutan, Sikkim, Darjeeling and the tribal areas in Assam. From the point of view of communication, there are weak spots. Continuous defensive lines do not exist. There is almost an unlimited scope for infiltration... European missionaries and other visitors had been in touch with them, but their influence was in no way friendly to India or Indians... Side by side with these external dangers, we shall now have to face serious internal problems as well. I have already asked Lengar to send to the External Affairs Ministry a copy of the Intelligence Bureau's appreciation of these matters. Hitherto, the Communist Party of India has found some difficulty in contacting Communists abroad, or in getting supplies of arms, literature, etc., from them. They had to contend with the difficult Burmese and Pakistan frontiers on the east or with the long seaboard. They shall now have a comparatively easy means of access to Chinese Communists and through them to other foreign Communists. Infiltration of spies, fifth columnists and Communists would now be easier. Instead of having to deal with isolated Communist pockets in Telengana and Warrangal we may have to deal with Communist threats to our security along our northern and north-eastern frontiers, where, for supplies of arms and ammunition, they can safely depend on Communist arsenals in China.” (Vallabhbhai Patel, November 7, 1950)

Is it not ironical that the Congress, which claims to have inherited the legacy of Nehru, is enjoying governance with the same Communists and has treated the patriotic force RSS as its sworn enemy?

Under these circumstances would it be wrong to ask: Who has the nation in his eyes today? For power and perks, anything is accepted and those who would say no to temptation for saving the interests of motherland are on the periphery and are hardly seen directing the destiny of the nation.

China's Red Army consists of 2.5 million soldiers. It spends more than two per cent (modestly 2.3 per cent, though officially 1.7 per cent) of its GDP on defence. The policies are concentrating more on eradicating rural poverty in a big way and the farm sector is seeing unprecedented reforms and privatization. China is way ahead of us in manufacturing sector and gross trade index. The number of universities and professional colleges they have created is simply astounding. These are heady times for China and the most worrisome ones too. China has emerged unquestionably as a major power and strong player not only in the region but also on the global platform. Its economic and military power is quite impressive and once Olympics are completed successfully, China would surge ahead with greater gusto and confidence. But its worries are also rapidly increasing.

Its two largest provinces – Xinjiang and Tibet – are seething with anger against Beijing. Moreover there is an excitement in the air – the will to surge ahead of everyone else and emerge as the unquestioned superpower. Every nation has a right to dream big, and if China dreams too big, none should object.

The question is: If Beijing is taking care of her dreams, what have we done with ours?

We hardly know China and neither have we wished to know her well. The largest neighbour and the proclaimed “biggest threat” to us remain engulfed in an enigma though our bilateral trade is increasing. All of China is being reported to us by westerners and we barely have one or two journalists reporting first hand, from an Indian perspective. What the Americans have fed us about China is all that they wanted us to know and react. What did our mighty media moguls do on this front? And the freshly sent correspondents will naturally take their time to adjust and send back the real stuff, though to be fair to them, so far their reporting has been excellent and without any blinkers – carrying the stuff Indian eyes should be seeing.

A friend too – the people
As usual there are two sides of the same coin. China is a threat, but China is also a great friend. There is a common saying in China that if you do good deeds in this birth, you may get to be born the next time around in India – the land of Buddha. But it's a pity not many would know about the immense respect for India that we see even today amongst the commoners. It’s just absent for any other foreign country.

I sometimes wonder – we have fought four major wars with Pakistan and Islamabad has been singularly biggest factor responsible for the terrorism which has taken thousands of lives in our towns and metropolitan cities. Though Pakistan hasn't changed, we are continuing our much hyped track two diplomacy with them and even the six-decade old ban on showing their films has been lifted with the opening of Khuda Kay Liye.

But China, with whom we have had just one war, it's a different story.

Perhaps we “know” Pakistan and China is a stranger. People to people exchanges with China have been minimal comparatively and except publishing bad news about Beijing's behaviour, hardly anything about Chinese life and contemporary changes in their social milieu is reported. The truth is that the people are experiencing an altogether new, fresh breeze of little freedoms. And India remains a highly respected and deeply revered land for the common Chinese – be it a practising Buddhist or a Confucian. Should India ignore this aspect and keep on creating an image of ugly, bad, untrustworthy Chinese? Good or bad, friend or foe, China needs to be understood by Indians more deeply. China is just not Beijing or the Communist Party. The billion strong population often thinks differently and that has to be addressed.

Firmness – with love and solidarity
So is the case with India’s outlook towards China. Till we are able to match the military and the economic prowess of our neighbour we will never have the guts to stand tall and as equal.

So, first build solidarity on China policy cutting across party lines. Be firm, firmer than their demand to annex our land, demand autonomy for Tibet in the real sense.

If they choose to refuse visa to our citizens, respond by saying no visas are required for any Tibetan wanting to visit India. It would be a good gesture if our Prime Minister addresses the nation on 15th August from Tawang.

Enhance military might and strengthen border defence by building all-weather roads covering the entire Himalayan range facing alien lands. A majority of Himalayan border sectors are in urgent need of metalled roads from Ladakh to Uttarakhand to Arunachal. Our political masters don't have time to look into the demands of our highly devoted soldiers who are facing the enemy.

Resist US tactics that are aimed to make us play their game against China. If we have to play, we will play our own game.

Democracy is India's biggest strength over the long term even as it creates weak governments and other problems in the short run. Democracy is China's biggest threat over the long term. India should not try to restrict the application of democracy in its own country to please a non-democratic neighbour. The restrictions placed on protesters and on Tibetans when the Olympic torch was passing through Delhi were obscene. Would the Indian government have placed such restrictions on other demonstrators protesting against another country like the US, Sri Lanka, Israel or Britain?

And hold the hands of Chinese people with undiluted love and confidence. They have positive feelings for us, courtesy the Buddha. We must teach the life and works of great Buddhist monks to every Indian; these monks went to China from India more than a thousand years ago on foot, crossing the mountainous rages of Karakoram and Himalayas, learnt the difficult language, influenced the aliens with their message of compassion, and brotherhood and left a permanent imprint on their mind and soul.

They were our ancestors.

We must prove ourselves inheritors of all that goodness and their unimaginable invincible commitment to values they loved.

Learn Chinese, visit China and find that the people are different.

Almost everywhere in China, India lives a vibrant life. Songs, music, movies and yoga are the new marks of Indiaphiles. The IT schools and software companies are new avatars of friendship and compassion. Above all, we have a vibrant democracy and the Buddha. Matchless Weapons of Hate Destruction. Why not give it a try!

It's a long road testing patience and perseverance to better the other. We have all the required ingredients to stand tall. Only the will is lacking. Walk this road with patriotism; Indians will regain Himalayan heights again.

India must stand up to China

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Columnists/Tarun_Vijay/The_Right_View/India_must_stand_up_to_China/articleshow/3002484.cms
Published on:-1 May 2008,

(This is a first part of a two-part series on India's China policy)

We must stop looking at China through American glasses and formulate policies on bilateral issues exclusively on the basis of what suits our long-term goals in the region rather than an empty emotionalism suiting local page concerns. We have to remember that in the world of diplomacy, the strong speak less and just act when required. India's China policy must be based on strengthening our position internally and waiting patiently on the external front for our time to arrive. A rhetorical approach often turns into own goals and mars strategic prospects.

As a democratic and pluralist nation as well as an ancient civilisation, India's place as an Asian leader has to be recognised and asserted. This has to be done first by us Indians and an all-encompassing effort has to be made to realise this position which alone will be a guarantee for mutual respect and peace among regional nations and will also keep it free of superpower rivalry.

Ironically, India awakened to her role too late and has given vital strategic space to China. With the docility of a colonial darwan and a self-defeatist attitude enveloped in left-ism, we have not been able to focus on the larger picture. Our leaders, in politics as well as in academics and media, often behave like a Latin American banana republic always in need of alien certification and appreciation.

Almost all the information that comes to us about China is through western news agencies. Barring one or two Indian newspapers none in the Indian media, which is otherwise quite moneyed in these days of marketing managers replacing editors, has cared to depute correspondents in Beijing or Shanghai. Most use American, British and French newswire agencies to report China to Indian readers. This has created a situation where the Tibet issue is seen as a US diplomatic victory aimed at downsizing Chinese “incursions” in the region and India ends up playing a less decisive and more ambiguous role.

The Tibet issue and the Olympic torch have only added to the existing unease in Delhi and Beijing which has shown up in some plain talk by both sides. Indians are being reminded that China has never accepted Kashmir as a part of India till now and that Beijing has been helping Pakistan's nuclear ambitions and strategic goals which are essentially targeted against us. We are also being reminded that China never supports us in international fora, it has tried to sabotage India’s candidature for UN Security Council membership, it uses Pakistan as a lever to balance the shift of power in our region and every now and then makes claims on Indian territory through statements and illegal incursions into Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh.

The ascendancy of the Maoists and Prachanda's “equidistance from Delhi and Beijing” statement, coupled with the demand to review the India-Nepal1950 treaty has strengthened the notion that China has now reached till the Uttar Pradesh-Bihar border and will use the Maoist regime to further encircle India through Nepal which was considered till now as a safe buffer state between India and China. Hence, almost everyone in government and political circles continues to regard China as the biggest threat to Indian security. The only exceptions are Indian Communists and their sympathisers in the media.

China too has allowed some of its academicians and analysts to accuse India of supporting a “terrorist” like Dalai Lama, of nursing “expansionist ambitions” over Tibet and of having failed to solve Kashmir's problem to the satisfaction of the Kashmiri people (read pro-Pakistani Muslims). Though to be fair, it has also thanked India for the safe and incident-free passage of the Olympics torch.

As economic and military concerns drive foreign policy, it's important for us to weigh the pros and cons while dealing with Chinese positions. China feels uneasy about our successful and vibrant democracy and the growing power of our knowledge economy. Our growing presence and acceptability in East Asia coupled with what is widely perceived as a strategic closeness with US has made Beijing step up its diplomatic offensive to check India and also warn against going too far with any plan that curtails China’s role in this region. They suspect every Indian move – joint collaboration with Japan, forming an “axis of democracy” with the US, Australia. Japan and New Zealand, joint naval exercises in the Pacific and Bay of Bengal and a resurrection of anti-China feelings among Indians after the Lhasa killings of Buddhist monks and the Olympic torch security overkill.

China needs time to consolidate its economic long jump gains and diversify priorities to the rural sector as it enters a transitional phase in the Year of the Rat which signifies the beginning of a 12-year zodiac cycle. Hence, for the next 20 years it would like to avoid major conflict with any neighbour but will continue to assert its dominance in the east and southeast, competing aggressively with the US economic regime in every possible part of the world. With its almost stabilized 10 per cent growth rate and a fairly strong military might, the Beijing Olympics' theme – “One world, one dream” – also reflects the ambition hidden at the core of Chinese foreign policy – the dream of becoming an unchallenged world superpower.

India will have to wait till a credible leadership with a spine emerges on South Block. We have all the potential to emerge a victor in this game of leadership, but the players are too weak at the moment. The UPA government is dependent on the left, whose leaders were arrested by Pandit Nehru in the wake of the 1962 war for sedition and supporting the enemy. This ultimately led to the split in the Communist Party of India; the other part became known as the CPI-M or the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Unless we have a strong nationalist government at the Centre which can deal with China on an equal footing, the daily pinpricks will lead to a cold war that doesn't serve Indian interests. With the Chinese economy almost stabilised and its performance in almost every walk of life being admiringly high, it is time we concentrate more on setting our house in order and catching up in areas where a lot is yet to be done like manufacturing, infrastructure, education and of course, military might.

Chinese reforms are now being followed by government reform and a strong focus on developing the rural sector. Its political economy is in the midst of a significant transition. Worldwide protests on Tibet have shaken up the political leadership which is still hoping to overcome the phase – remember the post Tiananmen Square scenario, what happened after a few cosmetic protests? Everyone fell in line and accepted Chinese positions for a piece of business and trade. But the present leadership is more afraid of a rural backlash and the rebellious new generation's demand for more freedom and democracy. This has to be tackled through slow and steady political reforms, keeping the unity intact with an iron fist and complete elimination of insurgents in Xinjiang and Tibet.

In this situation, India's position is not as strong as desired. India should have had the courage to tell China that supporting the Tibetan demand for autonomy shouldn't make China suspicious of our motives. This is not the era when China was considered weak and felt India could use the Tibet card to destabilise it. A confident and strong India speaking to another strong country like China should generate greater mutual trust than what has been on display so far.

But a weak and meek governance can't be expected to stand up strong and mighty!!

The latest report of the Ministry of Home Affairs says violence in the Northeast has exceeded the killings in Kashmir. More than 200 extremist organisations are active from the Northeast to Jammu and Kashmir and down south. Maoists active on Indian soil from Telangana to Uttar Pradesh and the Bihar border have a brotherly government in Kathmandu now. This is a spine-chilling scenario but only for those who have a spine and can think about the nation beyond IPL tamashas and cheerleader debates.

The government has admitted in Parliament that China has made repeated incursions into Indian territory. Last year, there were over 140 Chinese incursions according to the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP). MPs from Arunachal and Ladakh too have raised the issue many times. The army has gone on record saying there may be a Chinese hand in the flash floods that occurred in Arunachal. In the Rajya Sabha, the Minister of State for External Affairs E Ahamed is on record saying: “India has outstanding boundary issues to be resolved with Pakistan and China. Pakistan has been in illegal and forcible occupation of approximately 78,000 sq km of Indian territory. China continues to be in illegal occupation of approximately 38,000 sq km in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. In addition, under the so-called ‘Sino-Pakistan Boundary Agreement of 1963’, Pakistan illegally ceded 5,180 sq km of Indian territory in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir to China. China also illegally claims approximately 90,000 sq km. of Indian territory in the eastern sector of India-China boundary in Arunachal Pradesh.”

India will have to rise to the occasion, showing a democratic solidarity across party lines on its China policy. According to defence analysts, China has now reached the Uttar Pradesh and Bihar border thanks to an obliging Maoist regime in Kathmandu. This situation demands a serious reappraisal of India's China policy, which requires intense meeting of patriotic minds.

The author is the Director, Dr Syamaprasad Mookerjee Research Foundation.

Different strokes

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Columnists/Tarun_Vijay/The_Right_View/Different_strokes/articleshow/2982311.cms

Published on:-25 Apr 2008

We are all prisoners of our fossilised perceptions and often make mistakes in recognising a friend or foe. I have found that most of us do not understand; leave aside appreciate the great love and affection for Indians in general found among most Pakistanis and Chinese. We fail to distinguish between what their governments are doing and what ordinary folk feel about us. I think it's more important for us to build on the great affinity and sincere love that exists in the hearts of the people.

A film - Khuda Kay Liye (For God's sake) - I saw this week and my meeting with two noble souls from that land has made me think there is a stream in Pakistan that has to be appreciated and engaged. The changing colours of Pakistan need not go in waste.

While the truth is that if there was no US and Western pressure on Jihadis turning heat on Muslim in general there may not have been a Pakistani film like Khuda Kay Liye, the film is a commendable effort on part of a Pakistani Muslim which I feel an Indian Muslim film director or actor would find it difficult and inconvenient to show.

The film condemns and rejects the Talibani variety of Islam being propagated by terrorists and depicts Islam as a good, reasonable Muslim sees it, one who has been subjected to worldwide humiliation just for being a Muslim, post 9/11. Now, these re-awakened Muslims are trying to portray Islam in the language, idiom and style that the western audience understands and appreciates. And this is definitely not an Arabic Wahabi Islam, so much in vogue in our region, but an Americanised version of it, ostensibly to safeguard a space in the civil society. Hence their Islam is peace loving, egalitarian, allows music, and human rights and individual freedom too. Amen. I would love it any day and would not hesitate even for a single moment to welcome this trend with my head bowed before such practitioners of faith who can bring people, segregated by the fundamentalists, together. The movie has stirred up all kinds of responses. Having seen it and also being one of its first reviewers, I must say it's an elitist Pakistani response to America. That's it. If this is not followed up by forming a collective resistance to the Islamic terror, all this would remain a mere cheap ticket to enter western comforts of democracy and equal rights while denying these very elements in the Muslim majority countries to non-Muslims.

India, the worst sufferer of Pakistan sponsored Islamic Jihad - much more than what the US suffered - is simply absent from the radar of the Muslim mind shown under stress and in a reflective mood in the movie. Not only that, the film shows a person of Indian origin, a Sikh, drunk and responsible for the peace loving, just-married Pakistani Muslim's arrest. The latter is tortured so badly in the Guantanamo mode that he turns anti-America (That's what you want to hear? He says this has happened because he was severely tortured and his genuine declaration of love for America was not trusted).It also shows why Muslims hate America (really?); the reasons cited are the same that everybody knows - torture of Muslims from Iraq to Chechnya etc.

In spite of this, why should Indians welcome the movie? Because it opens a path of reconciliation and mutual trust based on the frank admission by Muslims that there are some elements in their midst who are practising an Islam which they do not approve of. What more is needed? But it also gives a message that the pains and travails of only the strong are recognised and soothed and not of those who are weak, undecided and compromising. How many Pakistanis would even like to recall Gandhi's great contribution and act of friendship - at the cost of his own image and the interests of his own motherland - in fasting unto death to force India's new rulers - Nehru and Patel - to give a whopping Rs 52 crore to Pakistan in the very first year of Partition? Have you ever heard any Pakistani leader or an academician praising Gandhi for that singular act of brotherly affection?

The film Khuda Kay Liye portrays a post 9/11 American attitude of suspecting every Muslim, but it also shows the good and the nobler side of Americans. Ostensibly the mention of jihadi barbarism on Kashmiri Hindus forcing them to flee from their homes in the valley or the killings of more than 60,000 Indians at the hands of Pakistan-supported jihadis will have to wait to appeal to a sensitive Pakistani's new-found Islamic reasonableness. The point is that even though it has become fashionable to show an ordinary Muslim condemning and disapproving 9/11 a hundred times it is still difficult to hope that "genuinely Islamic peace-loving" Pakistanis today would also want to portray the brutalities and inhuman assaults of the same Talibani elements on Hindus and declare that all that was and is un-Islamic? Till India shows its strength and an uncompromising attitude to deal harshly with terror trainers and their product, none from the Islamic bloc will be willing to look at our wounds sympathetically.

Even the Deobandi declarations and other Muslim conventions on terrorism remain vague to address the Hindu pains and end their generalised condemnation of terrorism with a rider that in a way "justifies" Muslim "angst" at American "injustices". Even if they show the clarity and transparency of remorse and condemn the Talibani mentality, terming it in no uncertain terms as acts against the very grain of true Islam, a bridge between Hindus and Muslims can be built. For this to happen quickly, such Muslims will have to be taken to see the ruins of the Kashi Vishwanath temple and the mosque built over its remnants in a way that even the blind can feel the unspeakable humiliation heaped on Hindus in the form of an Islamic structure. Would some Indian Muslim stand up and say, taking a cue from Pakistani Muslims who stood against 9/11, that this un-Islamic act doesn't have the approval of the true teachings of the Prophet?

One more commendable aspect of the Khuda Kay Liye shows in Delhi has been its almost universal approval by the Urdu press, which reflects to some extent the Muslim mind in India. In my own experience an ordinary Indian, be it a Hindu or Muslim, is more interested in living his life happily and as patriotically as is possible. It is the handful of religious leaders and poisonous organisations like SIMI (now banned) that foment hate with the help of secular fundamentalists who would never like to see Hindu-Muslim harmony. During the Ayodhya movement, the most vehement opposition to this harmony came from the Macaulayist and Marxist brand of Hindus who created and encouraged Muslim opportunists to defend the indefensible position of protecting the most un-Islamic structures built on Hindu temples and also gave birth to new divisions by offering reservations and loan schemes to Muslims on religious parameters. But the fast-growing nationalist Muslim organization, the Rashtravadi Muslim Manch, is taking the lead when it comes to restoring harmony through various innovative schemes like collecting a million signatures from Muslims for banning cow slaughter, distancing itself from Muslim invaders who were separate from our traditions and common mother land They also oppose slaughtering cows during Eid and Hussain's nudes of Hindu goddesses. Small honest steps make a big impact in removing fossilised suspicions and distrust.

Last week, I met a Pakistani journalist from Multan who takes a small idol of a Hindu god for a temple in his home town each time he visits India, the land of his maternal uncles. Multan is an ancient Hindu religious place celebrating the memories of Prahlad and Holika - and until fairly recently, a grand temple dedicated to their memory stood tall there. This was the place where Holika had sat on fire taking the devoted soul Prahlad in her lap, but the fire didn't touch the boy, giving rise to the festival of Holi. The temple was demolished with bulldozers after the Babri incident on December 6, 1992 and now a renewed effort to rebuild it is on. Khalid was asking if Indian Hindus would come forward to help. Another Pakistani whom I salute with heartfelt thanks is Ansar Burney, the famous genuinely devoted human rights activist, who helped release Kashmir Singh and is doing his best for Sarabjit Singh too. Burney discussed with respect the nobler aspects of Hindu dharma and surprised me with his deep knowledge about it, followed by an hour-long educative session on Islam. I was delighted to hear all that he had to say.

I have always had touching and genuinely affectionate experiences of love and amity in Pakistan among the ordinary people. Mullahs are different but why always talk imprisoned in their framework? To spoil is always the easiest thing to do and to build takes enormous amount of sincerity and time. Then, where do we go from this stand? The middle way of mutual trust and understanding is the right and the way of life. Isolate the Taliban element and build on your own strength to make an atmosphere of congeniality. Never pardon an unrepentant wicked but remember that a good faithful Muslim who realises the fallacy of the terrorist version of his faith and agrees to share the war against it alone can be a true friend of a Hindu.

(The author was the first South Asian editor to have entered a joint effort of inviting essays suggesting peace between two warring countries in collaboration with Pakistan's largest selling Urdu daily Jung)

India must speak out

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Columnists/Tarun_Vijay/The_Right_View/India_must_speak_out/articleshow/2960238.cms

Published on :-17 Apr 2008,

Ian Martin is a favourite cultural czar of the strong western Christian lobby who considered it prudent to station him during the tumultuous period when a new Christian dominated country like East Timor was being carved out of Indonesia. He was secretary general of Amnesty International and has also served in Bosnia-Hercegovina. His best known book is Self-determination in East Timor.

As was in vogue during the liberation theology days in Maharashtra's Talasari area where Marxists and the Jesuits carried out a joint programme authored by the World Council of Churches, Martin is dividing Nepal into smaller identities. He is also working with the Maoists to ensure they stay in power and their aides are fully integrated into Nepal's Army, Armed Police Force and the Nepal Police. There is great resentment against this move among the loyal Nepalese forces which are disciplined and well-groomed and have recruited members after rigorous tests, interviews and verification of antecedents.

On the contrary, the new entrants to these forces – the Maoists – are simple rogues who were inducted into the Maoist PLA either through compulsion or by selling them false dreams. Their induction into the regular Nepalese army will not only seriously affect the morale of the patriotic forces but give an immense boost to the terror outfit of Maoists to retain their hold on the governance and administration through newly-inducted Maoist soldiers in the state force.

Martin has been issuing statements and giving interviews each day like an extra-constitutional head or the correctionist interceptor. And instead of limiting himself to the monitoring of elections, he is becoming a self-appointed initiator of 'security reforms' and 'inclusion of marginalised sections'. The Maoists have compromised with the pride and self-esteem of the nation by demanding in their 23-point Comprehensive Peace Agreement that elections be held under UN supervision. This implies that the Nepalese people are not capable of holding elections to their own constituent assembly.

The UN Security Council established the United Nation's Mission In Nepal (UNMIN) under Resolution 1740 (2007) for one year with a clear mandate to monitor the Maoist ceasefire and assist elections to the Constituent Assembly. But under Martin, UNMIN has made people wonder about its real motives. Martin began direct talks with the rebel Madhesi groups, gave special interviews and issued press statements about including “marginalized” groups like Dalits and Janajatis (tribals) even as UNMIN staff shut their eyes to the vandalism of the Maoist youth wing – the Young Communist League.

Even before the process of verifying Maoist “soldiers” could be completed, Martin said he would ensure that all Maoists were confined to their respective cantonments. He also said those who killed Maoist workers in Terai would be punished though he had nothing to say about the murder and mayhem the Maoists indulged in. Martin has been accused of advocating press censorship in Nepal, prompting a journalist to ask him why UNMIN is raising the issue of press “ethics” and appealing to “exercise press freedom in accordance with professionalism”. He was defensive rather evasive in his answer.

He said in his briefing to the Security Council that ''... most important for the completion of UNMIN's arms monitoring mandate (is) that there is progress towards decisions about the future of those Maoist combatants whose status is verified within the framework of decisions about the future of Nepal's security sector”. Martin admits in the next paragraph that “views and expectations about the future of the security sector differ greatly and it would be unrealistic to expect quick and easy decisions”. Working on this “line of thought”, he builds up a case for extending his tenure and said at a press conference on November 6 last year that UNMIN was expected to assist on issues regarding Nepal’s security, including a managed transition of the Maoist army from temporary cantonments and restriction of the Nepal army inside barracks.

He not only equates the regular Nepal army with the rogue band of the Maoists but emphasises a greater role for himself through providing “assistance” in the security sector and “greater advisory support for promoting public security”. Back in July 2007, Martin had said “only Nepalese actors can rise to these challenges”, but in January this year, he began lobbying for an extension by praising the political groups – ostensibly the Maoists – who have been violating every single UN guideline for transparent conduct of the elections. In fact Maoists have left no one in doubt by issuing at least two public statements implying that the UNMIN is working at their behest. Baburam Bhattarai, second-in-command at the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), has also issued a veiled threat to send UNMIN packing if it “doesn't behave”.

Under these circumstances the security scene in Nepal remains uncertain.

Nepal turned red and the peoples' verdict should be respected. Who else knows it better than the Indians who have learnt to accept such major turnarounds with an unmatched grace and an élan that is rare in this part of the world. So Nepal's new rulers have nothing to fear from Delhi. But do we have the same confidence in Kathmandu's new rulers?

The driving philosophy of the Maoists in Nepal was born in deep hate and intolerance. They hated those who were not on their side and physically eliminated their opponents. So far the tally says 15,000 were killed by the so-called Peoples' Liberation Army formed on the pattern of China's PLA by the Maoists. They are such dedicated followers of the dreadful legacy of Mao Tse Tung that they are ashamed to have any relation with their own motherland's culture, religion and civilisational traditions and would rather call themselves proud inheritors of an alien legacy which is being revisited by the younger generation in China. Mao’s biographies have been either deleted or shortened in Chinese text books and the entire Cultural Revolution period has finally been recognized as a gross mistake.

But in this part of the underdeveloped, illiterate or semi-literate, corruption-laden land of weak and spineless politicians, Marx, Mao and Stalin are still gods of a leftist extremism, a fossilised cult of the bygone era. Like old moth-eaten files suddenly being dusted in a sleepy Naxalbari, communally hardcore, Maoist targets continue to be Hindus, Sanskrit schools and Nepalese Brahmins. None of the non-Hindus have been found to be anti-revolutionary. Clearly Capitol Hill and the House of the Saudis work better for their flock than the gestures of large-hearted, pot-bellied Delhi. Since India has remained mired in the same secular talibanism of the Left and the left-out variety and there are hardly any credible protests from nationalists against such gross human rights violations, the barbarism of Maoists continued for 10 years. The leader of the gang, Prachanda, became a hero for Delhi's glitterati, invited to address special media events as a red revolutionary.

Now he is the new monarch in Kathmandu with special absolute powers. As was announced by his party, Nepal may soon have a presidential form of government. India was prepared to face this eventuality, which is a culmination of collective sins on part of all the parties who say they care for Indian interests. The last 10 years were the most crucial for India-Nepal relations as well as Nepal's domestic politics. India either bullied Nepal or simply ignored its plight. The Nepal watchers and big mouth friends were more interested in writing long reports and giving speeches in their backyard than forming any effective strategy to bail Nepal out from its crisis. Indian Marxists helped their ideological comrades quite openly and since the UPA government came to power with CPM help, their actions made it clear that they will be happy to see Maoists ruling Kathmandu.

It just happened.

Now South Block thinks it is prudent to engage Maoists and have them included in the mainline political flow rather than keep them at bay and invite further animosity. Prachanda will soon be officially invited to India and our new envoy-designate Rakesh Sood, fresh from his Afghanistan stint, shall be able to manage equations with the new palace owners who don't find any dichotomy in raising slogans about a proletariat revolution with a Rolex shining on their wrist.

What are the threats that loom large on our radar if Prachanda chooses to show that he means Maoist business? Communists have never shown that power makes them sober and appreciative of a different view point. From Kannur to Singur and the blood-stained 'red corridor', the story is that power whets their appetite to be more lethal and spiteful.

Nepal should not become a hotbed of superpower rivalry. This time China has gained clearly and with Tibet already in its control, it has reached the borders of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Besides, Martin would be helping the “harvesting agencies” of the proselytisers. India can't afford to be a mute spectator to the growing threats in her immediate neighbourhood. Martin should be sent back immediately and Maoists need to be engaged and monitored closely. So far Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee has acted well though belatedly. If one goes by his patriotic speeches in the Asia Society, we may have reasons to trust his diplomacy.

Rebirth of Nepal

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Columnists/Tarun_Vijay/The_Right_View/Rebirth_of_Nepal/articleshow/2940127.cms

Published on:10 Apr 2008

Indians must be ready to welcome a new secular republic in her neighbourhood this month. Nepal , India's best friend and so far her closest civilisational ally, is set to reborn as a different nation.
Nepal finally goes to the polls on April 10 to elect 601 representatives to the constituent assembly. Of these, 240 would be elected through first past the poll system while 335 would reach parliament through proportional representation and the rest 26 would be nominated by the cabinet formed after the results. Nepal has witnessed a revolutionary change in its electoral system with special quotas for women (one-third), dalits and oppressed classes, with a provision for Muslims too under the head of 'others'. Though 74 parties have been registered with the election commission, of which more than 13 owe their allegiance to some shade of Marxism-Leninism, the main contestants remain Nepali Congress Party, Communist Party of Nepal-United Marxist Leninist, Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist, Rashtriya Prajatantra Party (RPP), Rashtriya Janshakti Party (RJP), Nepal Sadbhavna Party-Anandi Devi (NSP-A), People's Front Nepal, United Left Front, and Madheshi Janadhikar Forum. Thousand of international observers have arrived in Kathmandu to monitor the most significant democratic exercise in this tiny Himalayan nation, which was once the only constitutionally declared Hindu nation on earth with a 240 year-old tradition of Hindu monarchy. If Americans are there in a large number and former president Carter has arrived with a team of 60 members from 20 countries, countries like Japan, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Canada, Australia, Thailand, Finland and Norway too have sent their official teams to observe the elections with United Nation's special monitoring team making its presence felt through public interviews of its representative. The change was imminent since the royal massacre took place June 1, 2001, killing mysteriously the entire family of King Birendra, the citizen king Nepal has ever witnessed after the legendary Prithvi Narayan Shah, King of Gorkha (the word Gorkha or Gurkha is derived from Sanskrit word 'go-raksha' meaning the protector of holy cow), unified the territory in 1766 after winning the Kathmandu Valley. Birendra was a beloved ruler of the masses and I had the privilege to know him personally. He wrote a special signed message for my book on Kailas (royals were supposed to send their special messages unsigned only under the seal of their office) and whenever he visited India, we were invited to see him with family. He was quite unassuming in his talks, would offer to make tea for his guests and once also introduced his daughter Princess Shruti, who was then studying in Mayo College, Ajmer. Shrouded in uncomfortable questions, his brother Gyanendra rose to the throne but fell in public esteem as many believed he had a hand in the royal killings. Next seven years saw a turbulent period with more than 12,000 innocent Nepalese losing their lives at the hands of blood-thirsty Maoists who wanted to bring in an era of 'red revolution'. None of the democratically-elected Prime Minister could rise to the occasion and save Nepal from getting into a pit of anarchy and despondency. The writing on the wall was clear-an uncomfortable nation was yearning for a change which would see a new regime of rulers through a different mode. Weak economically and having a poor leadership, Nepal became a hotbed of various international players and strategic craftsmen from European proselytisers active under the garb of NGOs and various peace missions to the Chinese influences reflected in Maoists routed often through the Indian Communist outfits who were more than willing to see a 'red revolution' fructifying in the neighbourhood. After King Gyanendra failed to gauge the nation's mood and became a stumbling block in the way of change, a seven-party coalition shook hands with the terrorist Maoist group and brought them into political mainstream by inviting them to be their eighth partner in governance. The Maoist leader, Prachanda (real name Pushpa Kamal Dahal), became the de-facto 'monarch' and acquired fame by showing off his expensive Rolex wrist watch while sermonising on the necessity to have a proletariat government. His Young Communist League (YCL) became a notorious gang of lawbreakers forcing the Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala to dub them publicly as Young Criminals' League! He had to take back his words later under Maoist pressure though. In a bit complicated electoral procedure this time for Nepalese people (literacy rate-male 45%, female 35 %), the voters would be asked to use two ballot papers to mark their choice, one for the direct election of their representative and the other for the party, so that the proportional representation of 335 seats can be made by the party out of the 'closed lists' submitted of their probable candidates. Even much before the Indian parliament could approve the one-third quota for women, Nepal has gone ahead with it without much fuss. Though abolition of monarchy is almost a foregone conclusion after the elections, the main question being asked is whether the Maoists, who have tasted the power after a bloody 12-year militancy, accept the verdict of people? In case they do not get the majority and are voted less than the number they can use to influence the next government, what will be the fate of a nascent democratic secular experiment? Though one of the main leaders, Prachanda, has gone on record to say they would abide by the verdict, another leader Babu Ram Bhattarai has publicly threatened to begin another 'revolution' in case of an outcome against Maoists. The verdict of the people of Nepal should be supreme and needs to be supported.
India's interests lie in ensuring that Nepal remains in the hands of Nepalese patriotic people and doesn't fall prey to the western powers or the Chinese influences that would de-Nepalise the Himalayan nation to serve their strategic goals. The Chinese obviously do not like the growing US presence and Nepal is fast becoming a playground of the two powers in their war of influence in south Asia. For whatever reasons, India has lost Nepal and also the esteem and trust of her people. Nepalese politicos and media of the secular variety love to hate India and it pay politically to bash India in election speeches. Though till now, the relations with Nepal have remained more than the 'most favoured nation' status with no passport and visa required to travel into each other's territory, (just an official I-card would suffice, such closeness marks are fast changing. Very soon visa would be required and may be the number of Gurkhas in Indian army would dwindle to a trickle for obvious reasons. Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Nepal and an octogenarian politician of repute, once lamented to me in an interview that the slow death of traditional ties with India by the western oriented generation would change Nepal forever. So far every Nepali politician had his education and political training in India. Hindus of India find their religious pilgrimage circuit incomplete without visiting Pashupatinath in Kathmandu and so an average Nepali Hindu would necessarily visit Hardwar and Rameshwaram. Gradually with the weakening of Hindu centric politics in India and growing secular talibanism that thrives on hate-Hindu element, Nepal too found a feel of 'modernism' in distancing from her Hindu character and getting closer to western countries and influences. Though Nepal still officially observes Vikaram Samvat as the state calendar and the language is written in Devanagari script, things may change even in this area. Till now the state coat of arms has the famous Sanskrit lines from Ramayana - Janani Janmabhumishca Swargadapi Gariyasi - (originally Lord Rama says in Ramayana - O Laxman, the mother and the motherland are greater than the kingdom of heaven.). Nepalese of Rajasthani origin control most of the business and industry and they feel threatened by the Maoists. Now any Nepali who can afford sends his children to UK and USA for studies and not to Varanasi or Kolkata as it used to be in the past. It's quite natural too, seeing the global trend and centers of excellence situated more in the western hemisphere than in India. The other loss has been in the reduced numbers of Nepalese students in the traditional Sanskrit schools, which India had in all the religious places where Hindu sanyasins provided free education to the needy students. Nepalese students were traditionally coming to such ashram type schools in large numbers. Now as the Sanskrit teaching has been looked down by the state powers in India under a false secular dispensation, Nepal too has started looking in a different direction. With India losing space, Nepal has been targeted by Jihadis and became an easy preparation ground of ISI (Pakistan's intelligence agency) against India. It may soon become another 'NGO country' like Bangladesh if immediate steps are not taken to check and control the immense funds being pumped into Nepal by European Christian funding agencies aiming to convert Nepal's innocent Hindus. With China, Church and Islamists gaining ground in Kathmandu, it's a challenge for India's nationalists and Nepal's genuine well wishers to rethink their Nepal policy and channelise support to the democratic and cultural forces in a manner that Himalayan Hindu land doesn't lose her fragrance. With Pakistan and Bangladesh bleeding India on both sides and a threatening China on the North, we can ill afford to have a new pain in the form of a Nepal turned 'red' under a Maoist dispensation. Hopefully, Nepalese Congress and Communist Party of Nepal -United Marxist Leninist under the suave and India friendly leadership of Madhav Nepal may emerge as the final engines to the Nepalese democracy. Let's pray to Pashupati Nath to ensure that.

My God is green

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Columnists/Tarun_Vijay
/The_Right_View/My_God_is_green/articleshow/2923710.cms

Published on :-3 Apr 2008,

Beyond Tibet and John McCain's nimble-footed signals to White House, there is something that must concern us all.
Our life.
Our daily doses of air and water are going to be affected in the most serious manner in next decade. I was recently in Ladakh, known as the driest snow desert with naked mountains and miles of plains without a single green leaf. Now the Indus gets flooded and last year more than 22 villages faced the wrath of the river which has always been soft and placid in this region, though it turns ferocious and oceanic after reaching Gilgit and Bahawalpur. Ladakhi monks were not amused to see how climate change had resulted in huge glaciers across the border in Tibet melting at a faster pace. Down north not only is the Ganga, the life and identity of India, changing course more rapidly but the source of it, the mighty Gaumukh, is shrinking and receding at an astounding rate.
Last week returning from Kolkata, I realised we have almost forgotten the habit of drinking tap water. Each glass of water now cost us three rupees, half an hour's of work for a labourer in my village. Normal water, which used to be available so freely at railway stations and city corners and which the city municipalities and water boards were known to supply after heavy chlorine treatment, has almost vanished and even the water supplied to our homes is not regarded as safe. We are bulldozed through aggressive TV ads (“Use it otherwise you will get sick”) to install a pretty, sleek gadget that purifies tap water. It’s no more fashionable to cover the nose with that band aid-type white piece to show how bad the city's air has become; hence, the air scanner is a necessity.
The biggest catastrophe staring us since man began to walk and the Neanderthal inhabited the universe is global warming which is going to change the way we live, eat and die. Our agitations, aspirations and fulminations will come to naught if the politics of green management is not immediately taken away from the fashionable catwalkers who eye the dollars they get in huge grants and do nothing at the ground level.
Look around.
We are discussing Mahendra Singh Tikait and the price rise while Europe is debating measures for clean energy. Get me any party which has a line in its election manifesto underlining green energy targets or a commitment to renewable energy plans. Wind farms, hydroelectric and solar energy initiatives attract less attention than aids grants from the Melinda Gates Foundation and criticising novices for their kindergarten politics.
Our priority should have been life. But we are stuck discussing death and the darker sides of it.
Try to hold your breath for a mere 20 seconds and see how the lungs clamour to get a whiff of fresh air. We die if breathable air is not immediately available. It's so simple. Billions are being spent on bottling and purifying plants to get good, fresh, safe water while the naturally available sources are being contaminated in a planed manner spending billions. We make environmental laws for quoting at international seminars but keep polluting the freely available gift of nature – fresh and pure oxygen. Green acres, golf courses and the Lutyen's Bungalows Zone are meant for the rich and the powerful. What about those who live on the outskirts and populate shanty townships? How much do we spend on providing safe water to the commoners and ensure breathable air for all? If air and water are going to be scarce in the next generation, it's going to affect all and the rich can't survive on beer and carbon ‘die-oxide’.
Air pollution, in the form of particulate matter or sulphur dioxide, ozone or nitrogen dioxide, has a serious impact on health. For example, in the European Union, the smallest particulate matter alone (PM2.5) causes an estimated loss of life expectancy of 8.6 months for the average European. Air pollution is estimated to cause approximately two million premature deaths worldwide per year. More than half of this burden is borne by people in developing countries. "By reducing particulate matter pollution from 70 to 20 micrograms per cubic metre death rate due to pollution can be reduced by around 15 per cent," says Dr Maria Neira, WHO Director of Public Health and the Environment. "By reducing air pollution levels, we can help countries to reduce the global burden of disease from respiratory infections, heart disease, and lung cancer which they otherwise would be facing. Moreover, action to reduce the direct impact of air pollution will also cut emissions of gases which contribute to climate change and provide other health benefits."
Not only are earth's water reserves getting contaminated and air levels getting dangerously affected by global warming, the political powers of the western hemisphere are driving the world to another world war over water and possession of Antarctica. When Nicolas Sarkozy's party was defeated in local elections, he pushed the button to commission a fourth generation nuclear submarine Le Terrible (The Fearsome) and described the French force de frappe as a weapon of self-defence. "The security of Europe is at stake," he said. "Countries in Asia and the Middle East are rapidly developing ballistic capacities," he added.
Le Terrible is to be equipped with a new, nuclear-tipped missile, the M-51, whose range is secret but is understood, according to Le Monde newspaper, to be some 4,970 miles – able to reach Asia. From a high of 65,000 active weapons in 1985, there are about 20,000 active nuclear weapons in the world and many of the "decommissioned" weapons were simply stored or partially dismantled, not destroyed. Though the total number was expected to continue to decline by 30-50 per cent over the next decade, the threat will remain even if a single nuclear weapon is kept active. The West would like to keep these weapons but wants the others to keep off, in a brazen show of hypocrisy. That furthers the race of mutually agreed mass destruction rather than reduce the threat.
Even if one tries to understand the mad race for weapons of mass destruction, basically fuelled by the western powers, the logic given to raise effective deterrence is always against nature's laws and mass happiness. The Guardian screamed in a headline recently that 'Climate change may spark conflict with Russia' and 'disclosed’ that 'European governments have been told to plan for an era of conflict over energy resources, with global warming likely to trigger a dangerous contest between Russia and the west for the vast mineral riches of the Arctic'.
Since 1938, when Nazi Germany sent an expedition to Antarctica with a mission to investigate sites for a possible base and to make formal claims in the name of the Third Reich, a crazy race to claim Antarctica has been going on furiously. Apart from creating and maintaining conflict zones in our region like Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran and jihad factories of Pakistan and Bangladesh, Tibet and Antarctica are going to be new war zones. Antarctica is a beautiful garden of ice created by nature. Researchers say it is 58 times the area of Britain and doubles its size each winter; it contains 90 per cent of the world's ice The coldest place on Earth and, at an average of 2,300 metres above sea level, it supports a population of only around 4,000 people (a mere 1,000 in winter), none of them indigenous (penguins apart).
There are, however, the children of Chilean and Argentine women who have given birth in air bases so that the two countries, locked in rivalry for control of huge sectors of Antarctica, can reinforce their claims to sovereignty. Once again, the race is on to unlock the riches beneath the ice. By international treaty, Antarctica is neutral territory, belonging to no one. The 1959 treaty, in force since 1961 and signed by 46 countries, set aside the frozen continent as a scientific preserve and established freedom of scientific investigation (there are now more than 50 polar stations). If this region too gets into a bloody war of control, think about how the rest of the world's natural resources are being devastated by blind cravings for more consumption and luxurious life.
Here comes the role India can play in saving the planet from mass destruction – the natural way. Co-existence and respect for nature is ingrained in the psyche of an average Hindu. When Bachendri Pal reached Sagarmatha (arrogantly renamed to by the west as Mt. Everest), she didn't put her foot on the peak first but offered vermillion and the sacred red thread as her mark of respect for Mother Nature and then put the Tricolour over there. We never say “conquered the peak'” We scale newer heights with humility. A culture that feeds the ants, offers milk to serpents and worships trees and stones finds god manifested in every creation: Wind, Himalayas, Ocean and Banyan, Mount Kailas (Meru), Ganga and Cow. That's what Lord Krishna is to the devout Hindus. He is manifest in nature and good karma. The Lord has said in Gita's chapter 10 that –
Among the trees, I am the holy banyan tree,
Among the cows, I am the wish giving Kama Dhenu,
And among the water bodies, I am the sea
And among the immovable, I am the Himalayas.
Among the peaks, I am the divine Meru
Among the shining objects, I am the Sun God,
And among the stars, I am the moon
Among those who move fast, I am the wind
And among the rivers, I am the Ganga
And among the seasons, I am the flowering spring
Among the animals, I am the lion,
And among the birds, I am the eagle.
Among the great elephants, I am Iravatha,
Among the cows, I am the wish giving Kama Dhenu,
And I am Vasuki among serpents,
Hinduism is a charter of respect to the nature and living in the perfect spirit of togetherness.
Togetherness is the key word for a Hindu who can't think to destroy the creation for making a living. Let them write a new charter of mutually agreed principles of mass happiness and long life, crossing ideological boundaries and ways of worshipping gods. That should define the saffron way to worship greens of our gods – all collectively.
Sometime back the RSS chief K S Sudarshan met leaders of diametrically opposed ideologies like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Sheila Dikshit and Kapil Sibbal with just two requests: to save water and propagate Hindi. He says unless you are sure to drink the full glass of water, don't fill it to the top to save waste. Most of us drink less than half the glass of water and the rest is thrown away. Change habit to give a message of energy conservation. Simple mantras. There are more than a hundred globally influential Hindu leaders and equal would be the number of Christian and Muslim clergymen who hold great sway over their flock. Can't they all come together, may be eve half of them, for two point common minimum agenda - save water and air from pollution. I am sure it won't be against Koran or Bible or Gita. Let one religious leader take a lead to save nation from pollution and environmental destruction propelled by wrong state policies, may be their awakened followers can persuade them to take up such issues. It saves lives of humans and all creatures and should be deemed as the best offerings to the gods.

Monday, September 22, 2008

कश्मीर में यों जला तिरंगा

कश्मीर में यों जला तिरंगा
श्रीनगर में जला तिरंगा
संसार के किसी देश में क्या यह सम्भव है ?.......
क्या सोचते हैं आप ?
इस राष्ट्रीय अपमान का क्या करेंगे ?
क्या कर रहे हैं ? 
कब जागेंगे हम ?

Its not Tricolour but our patience is on test

All these become the masala breaking news of Indian news channels:
* If Tendulkar cuts the cake which is made to look like national flag, he is condemned.
* If Mandira Bedi wears a saree with the flags of all the countries portrayed on that, she is made to apologies.
* If a police man in 
Kolkata and one in Bangalore are dismissed from service for throwing the Indian national flag on ground, by mistake.
Then why double standards:
* During the ongoing Amarnath Sangharsh, Jammuites held the Indian National Flag and chanted 'Bharat Mata ki Jai' . J&K Police opened fire on them.
*  People in Kashmir valley protest by burning Indian national Flag, hoisting Pakistani Flag and chanting 'Hindustan Murdabad, 
Pakistan Jindabad'. 
* Every year on 14th Aug (Pakistani Independence Day), Pakistani flag is hoisted every where in 
Kashmir,  and on 15th Aug, same people burn the Indian flag.
This happens only in India!!!

Saturday, September 20, 2008

One crore for a dance, 5 lakh for the martyr

Delhi saw an unprecedented crowd to give final farewell to a martyred Inspector M.C.Sharma who died while facing the terrorists in Jamia Nagar last friday. Its heard a few lakhs have been announced for the family of the martyr. Money is certainly not a significant factor before the great sacrifice that Sharma offered for his motherland. But the Neeyat- the heart of the politician who signs such an order is to be seen in its true colours. 

How much they spend on the renovation of their house every year? Have the rich and powerful any heart for the brave and dutiful?The Mumbai item girls who charge, sometimes a crore per dance, have you ever seen them helping a person who died for the cause of the nation ?

Who are those Indians  who keep  their daily schedule as if nothing has happenned, the great super stars who charge 75 crores for a film and who continue with their global tour-the Unforgettable, who are they? Which country do they belong to? Are they worth the blood of a martyr?

Those Indians who are on a unforgettable world tour and doing all the masti and mazaa, never felt even for a moment to  observe a minutes silence in memory of those who died in Delhi blasts or to remember and pay homage with a patriotic song to the policemen and soldiers who die so that their nation lives and their world tour continues unhindered. why ? because that will disturb their fun and frolic?

Whats their colour if not tricolour?

What's their relation with those who battle to keep tricolour fluttering?

The politician's nation is his bungalow, his yearly expense accounts, funds , commissions and vote bank. Nothing beyond that ever happens. Each politician, any mentionable one, is worth more than five hundred crores . Have you ever seen them coming to help the soldiers,policemen or any person's family who died for the cause of their ideology or policy or programme or movement? Pl cite one example.

Do you have any idea how much they spend or make the state spend on their vacations, political tours, hotel bookings, suits, food and public meetings? 

The way the state helicopters and planes are pressed into service , at public expense , to serve their whims, egos, holidays, with family, the per hour expenses reach an exorbitant level.

I bet, you cant even reach the vicinity of the real Kharcha.

And they swear to remove poverty, serve the party, love the disadvantaged, make every effort to provide help to the teeming millions. After a good speech , tired and fatigued having done a successful tour, they come back Delhi to live in stinkingly luxurious atmosphere .

Monday, September 15, 2008

'Hindu hypocrisy'

RSS slams 'Hindu hypocrisy

Press Trust of India 
Posted online: Sunday, September 04, 2005 at 1423 hours IST 
Updated: Monday, September 05, 2005 at 0721 hours IST 

Expressindia, September 5, 2005 

New Delhi, September 4: In an unusually hard talk, the RSS has blamed 'Hindu hypocrisy and upper caste arrogance' for the recent arson in Gohana town of Haryana in which several (44) Dalit houses were set ablaze and even indirectly attacked BJP leaders for not applying the 'soothing balm' on the wounds of the victims. 

"Even if we try to view the incident in Gohana, removed from the political angle, it reflects the hypocrisy of the Hindu society and the cheapness and arrogance, which goes against national interests, of the so-called upper castes," Tarun Vijay, editor of RSS mouthpiece Panchjanya said in a write-up 
in the latest issue (Sept. 11, 2005). 

Maintaining that the incident was 'neither surprising nor new,' he said the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in Haryana, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan were victims of 'deep rooted hatred and neglect'. 

"The so-called upper castes cover up all their misdeeds overtly and covertly through their fellow clansmen in the administration and media. Irrespective of parties and their colours, they are all alike when it comes to atrocities on the deprived sections," it said. 

Referring to the BJP's September 1 decision to send a 'fact-finding team' to Gohana, he said, "the incident took place on August 27. The houses were set on fire on August 31. The news dominated every newspaper and television channel but till now, we have not heard of a single important Hindu political or social leader having visited the area and applied balm on the 
wounds of the deprived sections". 

http://www.panchjanya.com/ - "Panchjanya" - a Hindi weekly, dated September 11, 2005 

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

The 2 a.m. call

Last week Nirupama Rao, our envoy in Beijing, was summoned by the Chinese foreign office at 2 am to protest against what they said was a breach into their territory by Tibetan protesters who hoisted a Tibetan flag in their embassy compound in New Delhi. At first it looks unbelievable that a foreign government could choose such an unearthly time just to hand over a protest letter and alert India to Tibetan plans to organize more protests in Delhi. Yet this is true and so is the feeble 'no protest' by the mandarins of Delhi's China policy. 

A peeved India cancelled Commerce Minister Kamal Nath's China trip as an invisible mark of discomfort which can't be interpreted as anger. That's what compromising and spineless states do when humiliated. It's not to suggest we must send our armed protesters to Beijing. The response of the strong has to be calm but firm. Simply calling off a minister's visit is not enough. India should have protested appropriately and formally against such unsavoury behaviour towards a woman envoy. 

Nirupama Rao is a suave diplomat and a poetess at heart. She was a cool reassuring face of patriotic diplomacy when she worked as the spokesperson for MEA (Ministry of External Affairs) in Delhi before taking up ambassadorial positions in Sri Lanka and China. As our envoy to Beijing she has done well so far to earn respect and appreciation from all quarters. China has been pushing its expansionist designs arrogantly and encircling Indian waters from Gwadar to Coco islands. It annexed Tibet, forcibly took possession of Aksai Chin and happily took an illegitimate 'gift' of Indian land by Pakistan, it claims the entire Arunachal Pradesh and refuses to issue visas to resident Indians of Arunachal; yet we try to ensure that nothing should be done to displease the mighty dragon. 

And this is happening when the Tatas have acquired Jaguar and Land Rover, the two greatest icons of the British Empire turning every Indian joyous and reaffirming the truth that if leaders have failed the nation, its people have led her to glory. 

Now speaking for a Tibetan cause is not exactly supporting independence for the Buddha Land. We have committed that Tibet belongs to China and even Dalai Lama has categorically accepted Chinese suzerainty. But we have an uninterrupted ancient relationship with Tibet, her culture and people and we just can't keep mum over their plight. It's dangerous to link Tibet with Kashmir since they are very different issues. We have not annexed Kashmir; the people of Kashmir have always been leaders in scholarship and national identity since ages, defining and interpreting the core of Indian-ness. In fact we are victims of foreign intervention and Islamic terrorism in the valley. We are not 'Indianising' Kashmir, it is India. The vidya that emerged from Kashmir's Shaiva sect and Sharada peeth, the highest seat of learning for Hindus, Indianises the rest of India. 

Tibet is different. The Chinese state power killed and maimed and brutalised the local people, the Indian government lost the Tibetan case out of sheer weakness and a lack of farsightedness. Now the inhuman Hanisation of the Tibet land continues with the blood of the devout while Beijing refuses any dialogue with Dalai Lama. This has to be squarely condemned. This doesn't mean China will wage war with us on this. They need a peaceful 20 years to emerge a superpower. But we need to show some spine and stand up for our own dreams and inner strength. If India doesn't want an enemy on the northern front, do we think that China would love to have soured relations with India, enhancing trade and relations with whom are top priority? 

Learn from Barack Obama. His speech on race and religion comes straight from his American heart without mincing a word or skirting issues. He spoke for American dreams and the American people. He stood for the unity and strength of the land and faced the most inconvenient factors governing American life in an honest and transparent manner. That won him laurels. Whether he wins is a different matter but the truth is that Americans love someone who speaks for the unity and oneness of their land. 

Nor did Obama deride or humiliate his guru, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr, over his controversial remarks. "As imperfect as he (Wright) may be, he has been like family to me... I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother," Obama told an audience at the Constitution Center in Philadelphia. 

He stood for his family, proudly proclaiming his lineage and stoutly defending American unity. The media has unanimously described his speech as one that urges unity and applies a balm on social wounds. Even to an Indian his words inspire: "I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents. And for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible... It is a story that has seared into my genetic make-up the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts — that out of many, we are truly one," he said. 

Power and confidence flowed through his words. He has a mixed racial background, a Muslim history too and is up against a charismatic rival. Yet his candour and faith in America has won hearts. He has lived up to the Latin Christian roots of his land and tried to prove worthier than many natural born whites. 

How many Indian leaders have that faith in their nation's great destiny? They are ashamed of their nation's cultural and civilisational heritage and do everything to belittle the country. 

One can face the world only on the strong foundations of ancient legacy. China has a great civilisational history and a heritage that is has touched pinnacles of glory and achievement. The Communist government doesn't feel shy about it. In every official book on China, the glorious imperial past, its civilisational contours, the cultural and religious glory is presented with pride.. Patriotism is not a dirty word as is the case with Indian Communists. We can face and stand before such a nation equipped with the strength that comes from pride in our civilisational heritage alone. The poverty of pride in Indian roots and a sense of embarrassment about the Hindu heritage which is common to every faithful of Indian origin worshipping any god or religion create a paucity of confidence. India is facing the same black hole of self-denying secularism which makes policymakers distance themselves from faiths having any resemblance or affinity to Hinduism. The lack of Bhakti (devotion) in the nation's life mechanism deprive it of the essential Shakti, the ultimate power to deal with enemies within and without. Often, friends and foes are confused. 

That China should be engaged in a friendly manner is a different proposition. But to say we must ensure China remains friendly at any cost is a dangerously self-defeating idea which needs correction. The basic premise should be to keep our interest intact. If we need China as a friend, China needs our friendship too. If we are expected to act cautiously to strengthen friendly ties and increase levels of CBMs (Confidence Building Measures), China too is expected to do the same.