Friday, November 23, 2012
Protesting against inflation, BJP MP cycles to Parliament
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6GwxrurdRY
In a mark of protest against the UPA's inflationary policies, BJP MP Tarun Vijay cycled to Parliament on the first day of the Winter Session. The Rajya Sabha MP cycled all the way and said that the UPA's anti-populist regime has hit all the households hard.
Tarun Vijay cycling his way to Parliament
Tarun Vijay on Thursday was cycling his way to parliament to protest against the massive price hike
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Balasaheb, the roar of the Lion King
Rediff.com » News
» Balasaheb, the roar of the Lion King
November 18,
2012 11:38 IST
'It is difficult to imagine such a phenomenon anywhere else. From being
a cartoonist to becoming an agenda personified, outshining everyone else, is
the unique distinction that Balasaheb created.'
Tarun Vijay explains why Bal Thackeray [ Images
] was a unique leader.
I met Balasaheb Thackeray years ago when I edited Panchjanya. He
was warm, knew exactly the inner details of Hindu family issues and challenges
and said 'Unless you change your outlook to Hindu problems, the movement will
not progress much.'
I could not have agreed with him more.
He stood as the tallest figure speaking for a Hindu India [ Images
] after Veer Savarkar. His vision for India essentially gave the rightful place
to Hindus without compromising with the equal rights and privileges of the
non-Hindu minorities. Essentially, his Hindutva meant 'India, First and
Always.'
He was unforgiving to traitors, anti-national outfits and shady elements
that spoke more for Pakistan than showing concern for Indian sensitivities.
His Hindu-ness and the uncompromising devotion to the rights of the
persecuted and the victimised masses made him a hero in the eyes of millions
across the country.
While most political leaders cutting across party lines try to maintain
a sense of sham political correctness and cosmetically envelop their responses
in a secular envelope, Balasaheb roared like a Lion King candidly.
Calling a spade a spade and always keeping the warmth of hospitality
intact at Matoshree for everyone, friend or foe, he conquered all that he
surveyed winning life-long friendships from the top sirens of the film
industry, corporate world, Muslims and political leaders from various streams
of ideology.
He was the leader of the masses. And he meant what he said.
That was his strength. Challenge him and you may have regretted it
forever.
His persona exuded no artificiality and no compromise. People knew that
and hence the aura of respect around him.
The fence sitter leaders trying to compromise on basic issues in search
of petty vote gains feared him. They really had to think twice after being
lashed through Balasaheb's hard-hitting editorials in Saamna, the Shiv
Sena [ Images
] daily newspaper, targeting the shameless compromise on issues that affected
Indian security and the social fabric.
He was an enemy of hate attacks on patriots, he would never allow a
Pakistani march over Indian sensitivities, he would never care for the
so-called Hindu organisations' annoyance if the issue needed a frank and
independent response.
He was in his own class, a personified republic of the masses who wanted
an unforgiving line of judgment on hateful Islamist attacks on India.
His stand on the Kashmiri Hindu issue, Ayodhya, relations with Pakistan,
Maratha Swabhimaan, and sham, often anti-national expressions of secularism
bear testimony to this.
He walked his own path.
His undaunted support to Indira Gandhi [ Images
] during the Emergency is a different story altogether. Later, he became a
strong votary of Hindutva and never looked back again at the Congress.
His annual Dussehra speech at Shivaji Park was a tradition that almost
became a religious ritual when thousands of Shiv Sainiks would listen to his
fiery speeches in his inimitable style gunning for the Congress and those whom
he thought were anti-national and working against Hindus. With malice towards
none, he would spare none.
He supported Ayodhya full steam. He refused to come along with his ally,
the Bharatiya Janata Party [ Images
], on Presidential elections. If it was Maratha pride for Pratibhatai Patil,
Pranabda got his vote for being nice and a scholar.
He changed the usual image of the spineless, coward, trader Hindu type,
always ready to compromise. He wanted all Indians to be treated equally and no
special privileges to be given to anyone on the basis of religion. If you
attacked a docile Hindu, the strong response would also be there, and he meant
it, proved it.
It was the need of the hour. It is difficult to estimate how many lives
he saved by simply becoming a protective shield for the oppressed and the usual
targets.
If he believed in some cause, his commitment to it was pure hundred
percent. He owned up the Ayodhya action, he congratulated openly those who did
it, he never minced words . His candour won him friends even amongst those who opposed him.
He shredded to smithereens the very notion of being politically correct.
Correct was what he said and the political drill had to be mended accordingly.
He meant that political correctness was an alibi for backdoor compromises and
ditching what you always believed in.
For a hardened secularised section he stood as the fundamentalist, an
unforgiving and uncompromising leader who built his empire on parochialism and
hate for the minorities. That is the usual line of attack against him. He cared
a hoot for this. People forget that India has a tribe known as seculars who
have an intense hatred for anything Hindu.
Balasaheb rose not only to provide a much needed shield and force for
persecuted Hindus under attack from fundamentalist Islamists, but also
rekindled a sense of pride amongst the Marathi Manoos. Like a human being, a
society and a nation too possess a soul and a body.
In Maharashtra [ Images
], under the influence of Congress-led sham secular policies the quintessential
character of the land of the Marathas became diluted and blurred. His movement
brought the fragrance of the land to the fore.
The parting of Raj Thackeray [ Images
] definitely jolted him. It was an unexpected blow from within. The earlier
inner revolts had never bothered him so much. People felt he still hoped for a
solution to retrieve lost ground.
The way Mumbai [ Images
] was brought to a halt during his illness showed his immense popularity,
cutting across all fault lines, barriers, sectarian circles and political
rivalries.
It is difficult to imagine such a phenomenon anywhere else. From being a
cartoonist to becoming an agenda personified, outshining everyone else, is the
unique distinction that Balasaheb created. A trailblazer indeed.
Tarun Vijay, MP, is a member of the Parliamentary
Standing Committee on External Affairs and National Spokesperson, Bharatiya
Janata Party.
Tarun Vijay
Sunday, October 28, 2012
50 years on, NEVER forget the valour of the Indian soldier!
|
|
|
October 26, 2012 12:52 IST
'Fifty years down the line, she still
remembers her son and feels proud of the fact that he gave up his life for the
nation...'
Tarun Vijay salutes the memory of Indian
soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice in that unequal war of 1962.
Also Read: They
fought to the last man for India
Those who keep repeating
with political naivete that India [ Images
] was defeated in the 1962 war with China simply insult those soldiers who
sacrificed their lives defending the motherland.
They showed incredible brevity and courage
and fought till the last man and the last bullet. They did what they were
ordered to do. They carried out their orders till the last breath and embraced
death with a grace and elan that befits only the warriors of supreme order.
The nation still repeats the lines that Lata
Mangeshkar [ Images
] sang in the unforgettable song Mere Watan Ke Logon -- 'When the nation
was celebrating Diwali [ Images
], they were playing Holi with their blood.'
Jaswant Singh [ Images
] Rawat was one of them. He was just 17 when he was inducted into the 4 Garhwal
Rifles. He was a jawan who was trained for only six months, given a 3o3 single
bullet fire gun and sent to Walong in Arunachal Pradesh to defend the nation.
Brigadier R S Rawat described that day's
ferocious battle in graphic detail recently at a function to felicitate the
veterans of the 1962 war. He spoke about how the Bhullas (it means boys in
Garhwali) cut the trees and used their huge trunks to cover bunkers with three
layers of wood, how they threw mortars over it and gave the enemy the harshest
time before finally succumbing to the unending waves of attack by an adversary
who possessed far superior arms, automatic rifles and wore better winter
clothing.
Our jawans had ammunition that belonged to
the era of the Second World War, as well as inferior guns and clothing which
could not resist the spine-chilling icy winds in Chushul and Tawang. Yet they
didn't yield.
Those who were well ensconced in their warm,
comfortable and secure rooms in Delhi [ Images
] yielded to the enemy and bid a pathetically worded farewell to their men in
uniform and the patriotic civilian people.
The men in white caps were defeated in the
1962 war, not the brave men in olive green uniform.
Jaswant Singh Rawat's
mother Leela Devi Rawat is 92 years old and lives in Dehradun.
We felicitated her at a graceful function and
Uttarakhand [ Images
] Governor Aziz Qureshi got off the dais to touch her feet.
Fifty years down the line, she still
remembers her son and feels proud of the fact that he gave up his life for the
nation. Living in a small house with her younger son and daughter-in-law today,
she vividly recalls the day when her Jaswant went away to join the army.
When the news of his martyrdom reached her,
the future had looked impenetrably dark, yet the glory of her son's sacrifice
kept the light intact. Jaswant remained a living soldier even after his mortal
remains had been consigned to the flames.
The army maintained his room, he got promoted
every year and he retired as a major general. His temple in Tejpur reminds
everyone about not just the valour of the Indian soldier, but also his
immortality.
Such is the level of faith for soldiers'
sacrifices in India. Such is this Indian society which believes in martyrdom
for the nation in the most unbelievable manner. According to Hindu scripture, a
soldier goes to Surya Lok, a heaven made of a thousand suns, after his
martyrdom in the line of duty. This explains the Indian family tradition of
sending the best child to the armed forces.
The 1962 war shattered the belief in the
honesty and sincerity of India's political rulers. A plethora of articles and
analyses have been published on how in the 1960s, ordnance factories were
manufacturing coffee machines and lipsticks, when we should have been making
guns and how Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru [ Images
] was waxing eloquent on the uselessness and meaningless of maintaining a huge
army at an enormous cost when India didn't have an enemy.
Even during the war, the Communist parties in
India sided with China and Nehru had some of their leaders arrested under
charges of sedition. Workers of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh helped the
soldiers on the front.
The Nehru government invited the RSS workers
to participate in the 1963 Republic Day Parade to honour them. It is ironical
that today, the Communist parties seem to have become strange bedfellows with
the Nehruvian Congress and the political rulers look at the RSS with hatred.
Let us forget all that and look forward. Do
we have that kind of leadership today and will we be able to thwart any other
Chinese action against us?
China is fast emerging as our largest trade
partner, but it still keeps the border dispute open. Top army officers and
defence analysts maintain that China remains the biggest threat to India.
Are we ready to at least
equal China's military might? Is there political will across party lines to
look into our defence preparedness and have a consensus on securing our
borders?
The biggest threat to national security does
not come from external aggression, but from within. The corrupt leadership and
the lethargic babudom that corrodes the nation's defence and allows the
enemy to buy a 'win' is as bad a threat, if not a worse one, to our defence as
is the foreign invader.
The 1962 war was the political defeat of
foolish governance, but the defence forces did their bit in exemplary fashion.
On the 50th anniversary of that war -- rather
the resistance to the Chinese attack -- the most sensible thing would be to
salute the indomitable spirit of the Indian soldier and ensure a public debate
on our present defence preparedness.
The Chinese must be made to feel that they
inflicted a scar on the Indian psyche that is hard to erase They have to
understand that unless they show sensitivity towards Indian peoples' feelings,
no enduring friendship can be shaped, the increase in the volume of trade
partnerships notwithstanding.
The use of force to settle a bilateral
dispute is strictly unacceptable in today's world and to ensure that it is
respected, India has to grow enormously in military stature. A powerful and
formidable military power alone can win long lasting friendships and peace in
the region.
Empowering India will be the best tribute to
the brave soldiers who laid down their lives to defend their motherland in
1962.
Tarun Vijay is a Bharatiya
Janata Party [ Images
] member of the Rajya Sabha from Uttarakhand.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
India should match China's defence power: Tarun Vijay
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/
22 OCT,
2012, 10.05PM IST, PTI
MUMBAI: India should learn lessons
from the 1962 Indo-China war and relook at its defence
preparedness in respect to the neighbouring country, BJP MP Tarun Vijay said today.
"As the country observes 50th
year of the Chinese invasion, India needs to relook at its defence preparedness
in respect to China," Vijay, the Rajya Sabha MP, said.
Stressing that India should match the
neighbouring country in military might, he said "Friendship can be lasting
if the engagement is between two equally powerful partners. China should be made aware
that the scars it inflicted on Indian psyche are hard to be erased."
Vijay demanded that the government
tell the nation as to where it stands as compared with Chinese military might.
The BJP leader said India should take
up the issue of presence of People's Liberation Army (PLA) personnel in
Pakistan occupied Kashmir.
"PoK is constitutionally and
legally a part of India. The country should protest the presence of foreign
armed forces on its soil at the international fora," he said and accused
the government of not standing up to China's aggressive postures, calling it
"spineless".
During his visit to Milam glacier in Uttarakhand,
Vijay said he found ITBP forces have to walk 105 km to reach the borders while
Chinese troops have motored roads to ferry their personnel to the border.
In Ladakh's Pangong lake, China has
22 state-of-art mechanised patrol boats while India has two old ones, he said.
"The border villages are facing
unprecedented exodus towards cities. These are dangerous signals for the Army
as the locals are their ground support during crisis," he said.
Vijay demanded that the border
villages be declared as special defence areas and budget should be allocated
for their development.
He claimed that the NDA government
had ambitious programme of constructing border roads and tenders were also
issued, but in the last eight years there has been no progress.
Vijay said there is concern over the
manner in which "China was encircling" India in PoK, Nepal, Sri
Lanka, Bangladesh and Maldives. "Do we have an answer to counter
this?" he asked.
Thursday, September 20, 2012
KS Sudarshan: A leader who broke barriers
http://www.rediff.com/news/column/ks-sudarshan-a-leader-who-broke-barriers-column/20120917.htm
September 17, 2012 11:40 IST
Former Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh chief KS Sudarshan, who passed away on Saturday, broke the barriers of
past burdens, dogmas and ritualism and often faced severe criticism from
various quarters. But once he took a stand, no one could make him go back on
it, says Tarun Vijay in tribute
Sudarshanji was like a family member. Sharing the good times and
bad, standing with us like a father figure and trying to help. For him
scholarship, organisational burden and national policies came after human
relations. An emotional person, he would often engage visitors in long chats,
and it was a great experience to listen to his words of wisdom on science,
spiritualism, metaphysics, environmental issues and almost anything under the
sun.
Even
when he was the global chief of the world's largest Hindu organisation, he
remained the most accessible person on earth with whom we could discuss,
criticise, vehemently oppose organisational decisions, even express
disagreement on what he said or wrote, and yet be without the fear of any
'disciplinary action'.
He
was, after all, a father figure to us. A mentor who never got angry but who
tried to shape us through love and persuasion.
He
was us.
Yet
he never trod the beaten path.
His
first address to the nation, a press conference in Nagpur after assuming charge
as Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief, was on the economic situation and the
need to assertively follow a policy that would help indigenous industry grow,
provide more employment to the skilled and unskilled labourers and blue collar
workers. Contact Raman Singh (chief minister of Chhattisgarh) and get
information on what he has done to produce bio-fuel and publish a detailed
report, he would say.
His
long discussions with the then petroleum minister Ram Naik resulted in the
central government's policy on bio-fuel.
In
RSS karyalayas (office cum residence), he made it an unwritten rule
followed by all to only fill as much water in the glass as one is sure to
drink. 'Don't waste water, don't fill up the glass only to throw it into the
washbasin. Water is sacred and scarce,' he would urge.
He
tried to persuade everyone he met to stop ostentatious marriages. Don't go in
for such celebrations, it's a mockery of India's [ Images ] poor millions and a blot on Hindu society. And so was
his mission to fight female foeticide. We worship Lakshmi, Durga and Saraswati
as stone idols but kill them in the womb, he said in a speech.
He
praised Indira Gandhi [ Images ] for her role in the 1971 war and invited a huge load
of criticism from those who thought we ought to be hateful and hard-hitting on
the Congress. He hated the hate element in Indian politics and tried to reach
out to everyone as an Indian.
The
business of enlisting, de-listing and blacklisting is a Communist preserve, he
would tell us, why should a Hindu fall into that abyss and still hypocritically
keep on chanting the story of Charvak, the atheist who was given an exalted
position of rishi in spite of being an exponent of a philosophy that negated
Vedic principles.
Very
often, whenever he happened to be in Delhi [ Images ], he would come to the offices of Panchjanya
and Organiser and discuss several contemporary issues with the editors.
His knowledge of global affairs and their likely impact on India was awesome.
His friends' circle included diplomats, scientists, Vedic scholars,
environmentalists and economists espousing the cause of Swadeshi.
He
was fond of Atal Bihari Vajpayee's [ Images ] poems and would recite many of them verbatim at
several meetings. So when a daily newspaper published his interview that
created awkwardness between him and Vajpayeeji, he felt sad about it.
And it goes to the credit of both leaders' maturity that the bad blood was
removed and relations normalised.
His
knowledge of Islam was so astounding and correct that he surprised the Islamic
ulema and maulanas, whom he loved to engage in conversations. He wanted to
reach out to Indian Muslims and inspired many such organisations and efforts.
Perhaps he was the only Hindu leader of his stature who never forgot to send
Eid greetings to his Muslim friends every year.
He
would often come to our home, chat with the kids as if he was of their age and
watch some interesting programmes, essentially non-political, on television. He
was very happy when our daughter was born and came home to name her and be a
part of the annaprashan ceremony.
At
a later stage, when he relinquished the post of RSS chief, he would often feel
sad and lonely and recite Atalji's poems -- on the resolve to face odd
situations with firmness. About his failing health, he would say: 'I forget the
names of my close associates, it's a terrible thing.' And would often go back
in time, recalling his Jabalpur days, his roots in Tamil Nadu, and the plight
of Hindus due to their own mistakes.
Once
he told us that a great astrologer in Tirupati (now no more) had divined his
past and said he was a Sri Lankan Tamil in his previous birth. We all laughed.
Sudarshanji
wanted to restore the glory of Hindus the world over and would often say, 'The
time is very near when Hindu society will unshackle the colonial mindset and
acquire its destined place in the comity of nations. No one can keep Hindus
subjugated and a slave of political expediency for long.'
An
ardent devotee of Sri Aurobindo, he would declare with a great confidence -- a
new India will rise, and soon. Happier, mightier and wealthier. Hindus are born
with the divine gift of science and mathematics; no one can beat them in
scientific pursuits. It's in our genes.
He
would get enraged on seeing the plight of Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh and
even in India due to political vote-banks and sham secularism. The leaders are
spineless, they do not feel the pains and sorrows of Hindus, he would lament.
Every party has a Hindu leadership, why don't they feel anguish on seeing how
Hindus are being persecuted all over South Asia, he would ask. We must work
with the Hindus of other political groups and shouldn't be confined to the
Bharatiya Janata Party [ Images ] alone, but are other groups willing to receive us, he
would question.
He
broke the barriers of past burdens, dogmas and ritualism and often faced severe
criticism from various quarters. But once he took a stand, no one could make
him go back on it.
He
was like a family member to us. And to many, many Swayamsevaks all over the
nation. I regret not being able to have his best speeches and interviews
published in his lifetime, although a publisher had made such an offer years
before. But his memory will always keep us moving towards building a greater
and happier Bharatvarsh that is India.
Tarun Vijay is a Bharatiya
Janata Party member of the Rajya Sabha
Sunday, September 16, 2012
A Sangh Yogi - Pujya Sudarshan ji
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
' A Himalayan son, who became King of the seas'
Photo Caption- Shri Tarun Vijay congratulating Chief of the Naval Staff Admiral DK Joshi,PVSM,AVSM,YSM,NM,VSM,ADC in New Delhi
Press release
New Naval Chief Admiral DK Joshi described as the ' A Himalayan son, who became King of the seas' by Tarun Vijay, MP , Uttarakhand
5th September 2012- New Delhi- Shri Tarun Vijay, MP , Utatrakhand and National Spokesperson, BJP today congratulated the new Chief of the Naval Staff Admiral DK Joshi, and described him as ' A Himalayan son, who became King of the seas'. The meeting lasted about 25 minutes and pleasantries wre exchanged. Shri Tarun Vijay said that Admiral Joshi, who hails from his home town Dehradun has made every Utatrakhandi proud of his achievements and we hope that his tenure will prove the golden period of Navy's might and influence. Admiral Joshi expressed gratitude towards his Janmabhumi Uttarakhand and said that the best way to repay the debt to her motherland is to serve India and prove to be a worthy soldier.
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Friday, August 3, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









.jpg)




